The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Monty Davis

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only claims of notability are doing yoga naked (getting citations for public nudity) and winning 0.45 percent of the votes in an unsuccessful run for public office. Hekerui (talk) 10:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete China Daily reference is nothing but a digested rewrite of San Francisco Chronicle reference. Notoriety due to public nudity does not, in my view, constitute a valid claim to notability. Cullen328 (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.