The result was keep. A weak keep - based on national TV show coverage (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an autobiography of a self-help author. All but two of the sources are primary. The remaining two are used to justify the article's only two notability claims: that one of the author's books is a "definitive manual", and that it is one of the "bestselling book[s] of all time" in psychiatry. However, I don't think the two sources are reliable; one of them is a blog post, and the other is a website (human-nature.com) which was last updated in 2005 and looks to be little more than a link farm for Amazon referral payments. One would think that a "definitive" psychiatric manual would have a huge number of citations in the scientific and medical literature, but Google Scholar shows a total of one citation (in an ethics paper).
The article had been tagged as having multiple issues since its creation in September, but recently a new SPA has removed the cleanup tags without rectifying any of the problems. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bclorenz21 (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]