The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn due to misunderstanding. Learned something today. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

George Henry Cameron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO, as there is nothing to establish that the subject is notable. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guys, before you debate this, can I say that I have read that deletionists should always bear in mind that many editors update their article incrementally. I don't usually do this, but we have had a heavy fall of snow here and I saw my neighbour slip up. I just hit the create article button so it could be carried on with later and went out to help her up. Hope you will read the full article, not the history after one edit CheersBashereyre (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note this editor has only been on the site as an editor 41 days yet he seems to be able put articles up for deletion. I've been on the site 11 years have made over 60,000 edits and created 5,000 plus artcles and I would never dream of putting an article up for deletion without researching the subject first. How much research was the user able to do in the nine minutes between me creating it and Kirbanzo suggesting its deletion?

Kibanzo himself has now admitted he was a little trigger happy.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 14:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

uh.. Speedy keep, with some why hasn't Kirbanzo already withdrawn it? On top of being an Anglican Archdeacon, the subject's career is widely covered by The Times and several reputable books, along with a Who Was Who entry and a Times obituary... Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.