The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generic laptop

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References provided are blogs, message boards, or similarly unreliable sources. Rest is original research. I'm not seeing how this could expand beyond a dictionary definition. RadioFan (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless we want to permit articles about each individual product that happens to have a no-name or store brand, delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Looks like wandering original research not supported by reliable sources. The subject itself doesn't appear to be individually notable. — Rankiri (talk) 19:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete -- not a notable encyclopedia concept. Appears to be OR around a dictionary definition. N2e (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 11:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. The topic might be notable, but this article is just WP:ARTSPAM, just check links. I've removed one that had no contents whatsoever besides a truckload of SEO words. Pcap ping 11:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Pretty much a dictionary definition of the word "generic" when used with laptops... Airplaneman ^talk 05:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.