The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability clearly established, spam problems not present (at least not now). Please note this is a nonadmin closure. The Evil Spartan 18:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gather (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article was originally speedy-deleted as CSD A7. DRV overturned, finding a minimal assertion of notability. Still, Delete given grave sourcing and notability concerns. Xoloz 15:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete - Provides absolutely no reliable sources to verify it's peacock claims. DarkSaber2k 15:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per spam -- Magioladitis 16:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No notability through media mentions Corpx 17:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no sources provided to support the (conclusory) claim of notability. NawlinWiki 17:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Keep, thanks, Dhartung. NawlinWiki 19:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, article has been cleaned up and sourced. Silly voters, google is only one click away. --Dhartung | Talk 18:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- as Dhartung found --and anyone could have easily found -- Business Week, WSJ, DJ Market Watch--all three primarily about this website. DGG (talk)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.