- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Gamergate (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnecessary disambiguation page. Only one article needs a hatnote to the other two, and it already has it. wumbolo ^^^ 18:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- feminist has a point. It's only a matter of time before we also have "Gamergate (book)" and "Gamergate (documentary)". A disambig page is the best solution. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 10:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:CRYSTAL is not the best solution. wumbolo ^^^ 13:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Feminist. I also added another entry, an episode with a guest star plyaing a fictional character with the surname Gamergate, which is another valid entry. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A hatnote can easily suffice for this topic, there does not seem to be a need for a separate disambiguation page per WP:TWODABS. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, GamersGate is not something that requires disambiguation, so you really only have the ant and the controversy and an extremely minor, crufty character. I can picture a dual hatnote like "This article is about the species of ant. For the controversy, see Gamergate controversy. Not to be confused with GamersGate."ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.