The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gabi Hernandez

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

newly created soap opera character, no notability. Rm994 (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is full of incorrect information, such as who created the character, and spoilers and speculation, which is against policy. Suggest possibly merging it with Minor characters of Days of our Lives Rm994 (talk) 23:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Minor_characters_of_Days_of_our_Lives#Gabi_Hernandez. Oppose merge; subject is sufficiently covered at that list, and none of the content in this article -- unsourced, in-universe -- is worth keeping, anyway (or is duplicative of what's at the character list). This probably could have just been redirected in the first place. --EEMIV (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sans merge as above. Article was created by User:Gabi Hernandez whose user page asserts to *being* the fictional character. Right. Jack Merridew 07:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
comment; no longer asserted ;) Jack Merridew 19:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minor_characters_of_Days_of_our_Lives#Gabi_Hernandez. Deletion seems a little extreme here. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete no problem with redirect after deletion. Since there is no sourced content, it's all definitionally original research and unreliable. In universe nature makes it particularly worthless.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.