The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NO CONSENSUS. postdlf (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GRIN Campaign

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page from organization formed in 2010. Though there are several references listed that announced the organization when it was created, none of them are from anything resembling notable media. This is the only Google News hit - http://sdgln.com/causes/2010/12/24/respect-protest-anti-bullying-beyond-united-states - and it's just a repost of http://dot429.com/articles/2010/12/16/respect-protest-anti-bullying-beyond-united-states , which appears to just be some sort of social networking site. B (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The organisation has gained much media attention in the printed press in the south of the UK. One such article can be found here: http://www.petersfieldpost.co.uk/news/bordon/online_anti_bullying_campaign_launched_1_1996104

The http://dot429.com/articles/2010/12/16/respect-protest-anti-bullying-beyond-united-states and http://sdgln.com/causes/2010/12/24/respect-protest-anti-bullying-beyond-united-states are written by the smae author and do contain some subtle differances, it apears that the journalist works for both organisations but only conducted one interview.

http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/10/Dec/3101.htm is also a news site with many articles relating to the orginisation.

Spirit FM and RadioReverb, both radio stations in the south of the UK have also interviewed the organisation, http://www.spiritfm.net/news/review.php?article=340505 was an article showing this, however, is no longer avalible but http://www.radioreverb.com/index.php?id=107 still is.

Although some of the articles cannot necessarily be proven to be notable media the vast volume of articles displayed when 'GRIN Campapign' is typed into Google is clear evidence of the notability of the campaign.jointheworldcouk (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Lionel (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this newer campaign, of course, has loads of interest regionally but also has press coverage internationally. That they don't have a press agent is not a reason to penalize them. I think there are unique and one of a kind in a few ways and have enough sources to pass.Bee well (talk) 14:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)`[reply]
Weak Delete - may not be notable yet... -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.