The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion Systems

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporation but I'm not seeing any notability; fusion systems turns up a lot of GNews hits but none seem to be related to this company at all, adding Japan/Tokyo (their HQ) doesn't help. There was some text about a previous iteration of the company which claimed notability, but they were bought out well over a decade ago and history for that company should go with the purchaser. Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is difficult to do good WP:BEFORE because of the generic name, not finding necessary info to uphold WP:CORP. - Brianhe (talk) 00:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails notability tests; existence of a prior firm with the same name and one or two employees in common still doesn't pass muster, per WP:NOTINHERITED. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't verify notability from the links provided or from Google. There are at least five other companies named Fusion Systems, some of which are more notable than this one, but none have a Wikipedia article. John Nagle (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Brianhe, and, well, all of the above. Bearian (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.