The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mere existence is not an indicator of notability. Notability relies on the existence of reliable, in-depth sources, none of which have been brought up here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Furys Ferry Bridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bridge. This article is about a ferry that predated the bridge, [1], but the bridge gets a whopping three sentences of coverage. The national bridge inventory form cited is a primary source. Two sentences in this. This just doesn't seem like a notable bridge. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.B. "Dip" Lamkin Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herschel Lovett Bridge, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Edward Tankersley Memorial Bridge, all of articles created by the same editor. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Another ordinary bridge. Mangoe (talk) 20:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: As the maker of the page, I would like to see it kept. I still don't really understand the notability guidelines. The bridge exists, so that should be notability enough for an article to exist. However, I know there is a standard against this, too. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.