The result was keep. As even the nominator changed to 'keep', and there were no arguments against keeping the article, the consensus is easy to see... PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 18:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No significant independant coverage found. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
1.https://neuroscience.berkeley.edu/kids-are-the-reviewers-at-this-scientific-journal/ 2.https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(16)30941-2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi5i7fG3ujqAhWpoHIEHapMDOs4FBAWMAJ6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw3Cpl-JUYXqKc5392DLJhDH (Not independent (written by editor of journal) but cited 20 times (suggest. independent coverage) and in Neuron from Cell press not sponsored (Neuron is a respected H high impact journal. ) 3. academic paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121596/ 4.https://www.lycoming.edu/news/stories/2019/04/frontiers-for-young-minds.aspx 5. https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2019/11/psychology-professor-sabine-kastner-receives-award-for-education-in-neuroscience won award from Sfn for education. 6. Scientific American story 7.https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/how-to-better-teach-kids-science-just-ask-them 8. Another scientific paper https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc5459263
Popular News about journal stories indicating concept.
1. http://m.digitaljournal.com/science/rudolph-s-luminescent-nose-essential-to-guiding-santa-s-sleigh/article/452955 2. There are others but tricky on my phone.
The awards from American library association, the Society for Neuroscience, the papers in academy journals describing the concept and popular News stories suggest the concept of a journal being reviewed by children is both notable and innovative and should not be redirected or deleted. It would not be fair to apply usual rules per common sense re indexing etc. PainProf (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)