The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh Records (UK)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not have the "Significant coverage" that address the company directly in detail needed for it's own article. The only coverage that can be found is mentions and trival coverage. Mtking (talk) 00:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is an unsourced stub page with little going for it. The only external link is its official website. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 04:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can't find any significant coverage of it. HOWEVER, this label did play a significant role in the development of several notable bands including "The Art Attacks," "Cuddly_Toys", "Family_Fodder", "Play_Dead_(band)", "Wasted_Youth_(British_band)", and "Chron_Gen" and as such played a significant part in the history of punk music during its lifespan. I agree with Backtable on the state of the article. I wish I could I find some coverage to improve the article. However, I think an argument can be made that the label is notable and just needs someone with better access to music reference sources to be able to prove it. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Found this article from Sounds magazine in 1980, which should easily make it meet the notability criteria. I've added it as a ref. Lugnuts (talk) 18:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A significant enough label, that is also covered in Alex Ogg's book Independence Days.--Michig (talk) 06:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.