The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freewire[edit]

Freewire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been re-nominated in hopes of coming to a consensus.

This article seems to lack notability seeing that no news sources have seeemingly reported on it in years. Also the website doesn't even exist so there isn't really a way for us to find out what has happened to it. Which could harm its factual accuracy. Furthermore this article could be confused by an American start-up also with the name Freewire technolgies. TheUSConservative (talk) 23:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I'm fixing the nomination since this came up with the old AfD content. The prior AfD can be seen here. I have no opinion on the AfD at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:39, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was neutral in the earlier nomination, but absent any sources coming to light depicting this topic, but rather everything I found pointing to a different and unrelated company, deletion is in order. Jclemens (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I still confirm my original Delete altogether. SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons I listed inthe original nomination. TheUSConservative (talk) 05:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.