The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular ^talk 21:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of Expression: Secular Theocracy Versus Liberal Democracy

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:RS sources or secondary listed, indeed, zero sources at all given for the article. It includes WP:NOR and use of direct quotes without reliance on any secondary sources whatsoever. Could use additional community discussion to determine consensus if it passes WP:NOTE, and has whether or not it has received significant coverage from reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. -- Cirt (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not all books by Sitaram goel have stirred by controversy and created GNG. This one too hasn't.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to meet any of the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (books). Sita Ram Goel is only the editor, and minor contributor. --Bejnar (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.