The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 20:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frederica Mathewes-Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article relies too much on primary sources and there's not a single coverage of her from independent sources (i.e nonreligious publications) that could establish her notability. Slightlymad 03:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As above - not many ghits. Doesn't seem notable.Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I added a Media section to the article outlining some of her contributions. She has been someone the media has consistently consulted for many years. GeorgeofOrange (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Frederica Mathewes-Green has been a leading writer in the national forum, on topics related to Eastern Orthodox belief and practice for many years. AmityNook (talk) 02:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Article could be improved some more (maybe trimmed?), but she does have coverage in independent sources and meets WP:GNG, so I think the case for keeping is sufficiently met.[1][2][3] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of those 3 sources, I cannot open the first, which is in the group blog Patheos, but the 2nd is letter-to-the-editor referencing an article written by Mathewes-Green; and the 3rd is a book that quotes something she once wrote. None of these supports notability. At this point, I'm not seeing notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. as an author. Most of the remainder of the article is fluff, especially the media section, and if the article is kept, I will remove it. DGG ( talk ) 21:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.