The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 23:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frayed knights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find video game sources: "Frayed knights" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Seems to fail WP:NOTE as its an indie game with no other distinctions. A google for it turns up one notable review that I could find and the typical entries into game databases, which hardly establishes notability. TKK ^{bark !} 12:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 14:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - A google for it reveals previews and reviews on numerous games sites. Rrreese (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment - could you provide links to these? -- Whpq (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as passing GNG with multiple reliable WP:VG/RS sources [1][2][3]. Not a whole lot, but above the bar. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.