The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against merging. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see this organization briefly mentioned as a funder of research in various news or scholarly articles but cannot locate in-depth sources that would satisfy WP:NORG. The only independent source cited that might have significant coverage is GuideStar Pro which I cannot access. [Edit: it doesn't, see below]. This source looks independent but actually, its author is listed as a contact person for FAMSI. In any event, multiple independent sources with in-depth coverage are required to meet WP:NORG. (t · c) buidhe 17:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe As it's no longer an organization. WP:NORG is not the right policy. WP:WEB would be the correct notability policy for the website.4meter4 (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WEBCRIT has the same requirement: "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." (t · c) buidhe 03:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.