The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Focus Integrated Fitness

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes only a couple claims of notability. One of these (that it's the "largest in-home personal training company in NYC") is unsourced and is in any case of dubious importance. The other (celebrity clients) is sourced to the company's own website. None of the independent references cover the subject in any depth; they are just general fitness articles which happen to briefly quote two people associated with this company. Psychonaut (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The cites don't indicate any notability associated with the company qua company; it is possible that the individuals who are cited are notable but that's a different discussion. And when I hit a word like "luxury" right off the bat, along with the unsourced claims of primacy, I tend to look at the article as being in the nature of advertising. Ubelowme _U ^Me 17:56, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is the purest spam, a violation of WP:ADVERT. Qworty (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.