The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flash Element Tower Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested WP:PROD. I reiterate my reason behind the prod:

I cannot find any reliable secondary sources that can establish any notability of this game. The one review source from JayIsGames is unreliable because it is user-generated content. The blog given is likewise unreliable as it does not seem to be a professional blog or anything similar. The other source indicates a big number and, similar to the search engine test, does not solely determine notability.

Note that I deprodded this myself per the comment made at Talk:Flash Element Tower Defense, which is basically an opposition to the prod - in order to facilitate bringing to AFD. MuZemike 17:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I hadn't heard of this one either, but someone pointed out to me that it is arguably the first Tower Defense game ever. So I did a little digging and found a few references. I think it's enough to barely assert notability. Randomran (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was searching under "Flash Element Tower Defense" as opposed to "Flash Element TD", in which I was unaware that the latter is the actual name of the game. Make sure the article gets moved to the correct title. I withdraw the AFD with apologies. MuZemike 20:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Innocent mistake, I've had a few. For some unknown reason, I did the search as "Flash Element" "Tower Defense". My searches for third-party sources have kind of become an instinct. Randomran (talk) 03:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.