The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steffan_Cravos#Fitamin_Un. MBisanz ^talk 01:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fitamin Un

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic about an underground record label appears to fail WP:N. Searches in Google Books and News archive are only providing passing mentions (e.g. [1], [2].) Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Steffan_Cravos#Fitamin_Un - It seems this is yet another indie label that hasn't received significant attention and doesn't have an official website. My own search provided results here (brief email announcement) and here (brief and unreliable forum post). I found some brief mentions in Welsh so it's possible any other sources aren't English. Unfortunately, I haven't found anything to support the information at the "Fitamin Un" section of Steffan's article but it's probably better than deleting. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two references from BBC websites, but not sure if this will satisfy. Lack of on-line references (in Welsh, English or whatever) is a problem with Welsh articles and I should imagine with a lot of minority languages. In the grand scheme of things, the label was not that notable, but as they were a 'major' label withing a minority music genere within minority language group they were quite important.--Rhyswynne (talk) 10:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even if the artists it signed were notable, there doesn't seem to be anything supporting that the label itself is. 1292simon (talk) 12:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.