The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Yes, it has been established in multiple other AfDs that sites on the NRHP (and the counterparts in England, listed buildings) are considered notable by Wikipedia's standards because of the amount of documentation associated with such structures as well as the government recognition that they are important. From the NRHP website: "Listing in the National Register honors a historic place by recognizing its importance to its community, State or the Nation". Nev1 (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The notability derives from the structure, through NHRP, not the organization. It doesn't matter that the organization likely fails WP:CORP. PhGustaf (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The congregation, as an organization, fails notability. However, the structure meets notability by its listing on the National Register of Historic Places. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.