The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Delete - although I love this film and would prefer to keep this article, there is no evidence of real-world notability per WP:FICT. Delete (sadly) unless further sources are added to demonstrate coverage by independent sources. Walton monarchist89 15:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to the The Fifth Element. While it can't stand alone, it should lead to the main entry with which it is closely associated. --Tikiwont 16:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Tikiwont. -Gomm 23:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep or Merge While this article may seem useless to most people, including myself, all of the facts are backed up by the film and it is a notable film. The article would probably be better off merged with The Fifth Element though, than on it's own. (Third3rdIII 23:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.