The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 08:00Z

Fart fetishism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Another unsourced paraphilia. The closest it comes to a reliable source is citing Joyce, who the article speculates may have had the fetish. For fetishes we should require at the very least some citations from reliable sexual health and medical sources. Gassyerotica.com probably does not quite qualify there... Previously kept by what looks like a vote count back in 2005. Guy (Help!) 11:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - WP:V and WP:RS are not negotiable. Moreschi ^Deletion! 11:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - fails WP:V SkierRMH 11:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails WP:V and is probably original research. --Nearly Headless Nick 11:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:V I know that there is no censorship on Wikipedia. I suppose this is a good idea.....--Anthony.bradbury 12:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MER-C 12:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Unsourced fetishcruftbollocks. MartinDK 13:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Trivial stuff should not need verification. --Easyas12c 16:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Trivial stuff especially needs verification. Shimeru 20:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, violates WP:V (needed, because it's policy). No WP:RS indicating this is a fetish noted outside of the generalization that "well, everything can be a fetish". --Kinu ^t/_c 21:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Kinu. And, um, ew. Danny Lilithborne 22:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverified, thus failing a crucial content policy.-- danntm ^T _C 22:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 00:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.