The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Faroese constitutional referendum

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was proposed for deletion for the second time, so I bring this here. I agree with the nominator, however, there no evidence that this is scheduled for a vote, being debated, or even a possibility. The 2010 referendum was an idea in 2008 but went nowhere. Hekerui (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seemingly never going to happen. If the idea is ever resurrected, it can easily be restored. Number 5 7 21:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A High Beam search for Faroe Islands constitution (not exact phrase) yielded 24 results, some not on point. The only hit during the past two years is not on point. This appears to be a dead issue, speculative at best. Donner60 (talk) 07:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably right, yes. —Nightstallion 09:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. It may have been notable if it happened, but it didn't. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.