The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. We don't need a family tree of every single companion of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Everything of importance should already be mentioned in Abu Bakr, and if it isn't, then I guess merge it. Pepsidrinka07:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Abu Bakr. Details of someone's family tree are more informative to the reader in the context of the person, not as a web of satellite nanoarticles. Weregerbil22:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Green Giant. A much better way for a reader to understand a genealogical tree than individual nodes for each person or random persons in the tree. Weregerbil08:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.