The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted - blatant hoax/nonsense/vandalism. - Mike Rosoft 09:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fahad Ahmed

[edit]

Looks like a hoax/fictional vanity article. About someone who "is regarded as the one of the (sic) greatest mathematicians in quantum electrodynamics" but neither Google nor Google Scholar offer evidence for this. Pseudo-mathematical terms like Fahad's Law and Heineman Maths Constant likewise draw a blank, as do many of the names of his associates. Coincidentally (maybe), a vanity bio for a non-notable maths student of the same name was speedied a couple of days ago. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 19:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. —Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 19:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete The article describes someone who is very notable. Unfortunately, that person is called Stephen Hawking, and this article has changed a bunch of words from his article, most notably his name. Thomjakobsen 19:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "religious views" section is also a rewording of the one in the article Paul Dirac.Thomjakobsen 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
... and the paragraphs starting, "Ahmed drew on his broad knowledge of physics..." and, "Early in his career, he supported Fred Hoyle's steady state cosmology..." are rewordings of parts of Dennis_William_Sciama. No further discussion necessary :) Thomjakobsen 19:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax. No hits. Also no relevant hits for the claimed "well known mathematicians" with whom he is claimed to have worked. "The Fahad equation is as central to theoretical physics as the Maxwell, Yang-Mills and Einstein field equations. Fahad is regarded as the one of the greatest mathematicians in quantum electrodynamics." but nobody including google has ever heard of him? I call shenanigans. DMacks 19:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- → AA ^(talk) — 19:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete not worth talking about.... --Crusio 19:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as hoax. wikipediatrix 19:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've tagged this for speedy per Thomjakobsen's investigations - good catch that man! Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 19:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Good hoax, but delete anyway. • Lawrence Cohen 20:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax per nom and others. GlassCobra 22:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I removed the speedy tag so the afd could run its course and permit G4 to be used against re-creation, but I'd have no objection to an early closure as WP:SNOW. DGG (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and looking also at the previous repeated attempts at creating an article under this name, I'd suggest salting against re-creationDGG (talk) 22:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per most of the above.--JForget 23:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.