The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fab family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD where the reasoning was Unreferenced article, group with no significant claims of notability. I was going to speedy it using A7, but figured it might be better to get a consensus on this article instead.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 22:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Notability does not appear to have been established, appears to be simply a promotional platform. - SudoGhost™ 19:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no evidence of notability. PKT(alk) 20:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.