The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I.e., not delete; mergers or redirects should be discussed on the talk page, not at AfD.  Sandstein  09:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FV Monte Galineiro[edit]

FV Monte Galineiro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article sketchily details the sinking of a fairly large (but not notably so) Spanish fishing vessel. No one was killed, there has been no major international coverage for any reason and it has not, so far at least, resulted in any legislation or courtcases that have had an effect on Spanish fishing vessels in general. The only "notable" aspect (using the term loosely) is the involvement of CCGS Leonard J. Cowley, to which this article should be merged. Dozens of ships like this go down every year all over the world, and this is not a notable exception among them.Jackyd101 (talk) 19:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep If there are dozens, or hundreds -- and I suspect it's more likely to be hundreds--we can deal with that--- NOT PAPER. Good sources. We perhaps need a standard for non-fatal accidents of this sort, but we do not have one. DGG (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no evidence that this is more notable than the sinking of any other fishing vessel. Although obviously not directly applicable, events like this should be held to a similar standard to WP:AIRCRASH. Thryduulf (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There is no "must be deaths" clause in WP:NOTABILITY, which this article passes. Last AfD was less than four months ago. Too soon for me to re-nominate. --Oakshade (talk) 02:18, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and re-direct to CCGS Leonard J. Cowley. The "we're not using paper" reasoning never makes sense to me. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of shipwrecks in 2009 where the event is now adequately covered. Mjroots (talk) 09:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to CCGS_Leonard_J._Cowley with appropriate redirect. --Brad (talk) 05:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.