The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. Sources used are too weak to support the article. —Jeremy v^_^vComponents:VSM 21:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just because the female equivalent is notable (though vulgar) doesn't make the male version notable. Sources provided are certainly not reliable, so this article fails our notability requirements. Cullen328Let's discuss it 05:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not-notable.--Slon02 (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.