The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exquisite Knives

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously soft-deleted, then recreated, so no longer eligible for PROD. Borderline significance claims, so I declined the A7 tagging but nothing I found searching the web indicates that this might really be a notable organization or company, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. So Why 12:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability per WP:CORP, and I could find no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Evidently the article creator had the same problem, as in its present state nearly all of the references are about completely unrelated knife makers or companies, but containing the words "exquisite knives". Creation was the first edit of a new account, and from the tone I'm guessing WP:COI. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.