The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 21:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation facility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is barely even a stub; it's more a dictionary type definition. There is already more content about explanation facilitiess in the Expert system and Knowledge acquisition articles. If at some point there is so much additional info in one of those articles we can spin off a new one but at this point I think this article should be deleted. MadScientistX11 (talk) 14:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The Expert system article doesn't use this exact term, but it does cover the same ground in more detail. If "explanation facility" is better than "explanation capabilities", the expert system article can be edited to use it. – Margin1522 (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.