The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence against Armenian Genocide

[edit]

POV Fork of the currently protected Armenian Genocide article, and Denial of the Armenian Genocide. Article marked for speedy deletion, moved to AfD for procedural reasons. yandman 13:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, preferably speedy. Trolling, original research, inherently pov, soapbox, etcetera. Content forking of the textdump that got Armenian Genocide protected. Any valuable content (probably none) should be added to Armenian Genocide and Denial of the Armenian Genocide. A ecis^Bravado 14:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy POV fork Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Aecis Nareklm 14:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fork and add useful content, if any, to main articles. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Aecis.-- Ευπάτωρ ^Talk!! 15:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete npov and OR. --Tainter 15:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and right speedily per Aecis --Lee Vonce 16:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Violates just about every policy here. --Folantin 20:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete of course...should be most obvious that this article has no place here...but really a good use for this section would be to move it in its entirety to the Genocide Denial article as a perfect example of nearly all the elements of classic genocide denial. Additionally I think it esentially is hate speech. Can you imagine if this type of section was placed into the Holocaust article - composed such as it is - of essentially wartime propoganda designed to stir hate and justify and minimize the actions taken against the victims of genocide? --THOTH 22:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 23:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Aecis. Carlossuarez46 02:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not encyclopedic, obviously written by someone with an agenda. While it should be okay if someone would add references to information from people who deny the Armenian genocide, as it is this is just original research and full of unsourced "facts". More importantly, if there were any useful content, it could simply be placed in Denial of the Armenian Genocide.--213.46.128.161 08:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete per aecis & strongly suggest salt as there are a lot of nationalist extremists who believe this rubbish, not unlikely to come up again. ⇒ bsnowball 09:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - tempted to suggest BJAODN WilyD 14:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and/or Salt per Aecis. I suggest that this gets salted because I have a feeling that even if it is deleted it will appear again in the future. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 00:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete delete delete. Poorly written (though that is not a reason to delete), emotionally charged (again, no reason to necessarily delete, if it could be credibily rewritten or heavily edited) but on a highly disputed topic, wholly unfounded, and lacks utter credibility or verifiable citations. Caliwiki123 21:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteEverything is already discussed in other articles, and is inheritly POV.--Sefringle 06:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper 213.46.128.161 Ombudsee 09:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.