The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everafter (webcomic)

[edit]

This does not seem to pass WP:WEB. There is only 1 assertion of notability, that the comic strip is "widely popular", yet there are no references given to support this. Article seems designed to promote the comic.Delete TheRingess (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the proof is, as they say, in the pudding. And pease porridge in the pot, still needs reliable sources to back up notability, nine days old or not. --Haemo 07:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Snafu Comics.--Edtropolis 16:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — and do not merge. There are no independant sources to back the claims of notability, so the information should not be moved. *Cremepuff 222* 00:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. JJL 17:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete This probably fails notability, however it seems sort of on the edge. Maybe redirect if not delete? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 05:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.