The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eurocontinental champion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Just created, however, irrelevant creation. This title has never existed in WWE and is just a "term" to refer wrestlers who have won the WWE Intercontinental Championship and WWE European Championship (hence Euro-continental). Their is no such a thing as a "Eurocontinental Championship or Eurocontinental Champion" and is just a hypothetical term. No sense in merging as term is rarely ever used. S_RX 00:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as nominator of deletion.--S_RX 00:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not an actual championship. Perhaps put the content into the Intercontinental and European Championship articles. Lastingsmilledge (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the user has only created this page after adding to the the wrestler's articles concerned. Unlike the TCC and GSC, which at least have a sliver of evidence for them, this has only really been used by Kurt Angle as a jokey attack on D'Lo Brown, and is not a real term. I agree that no merge is needed as well. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.