The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etihad Player Of The Month

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. WP:FANCRUFT and does not avoid WP:Recentism JMHamo (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 21:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Is an official trophy given out by the club. Thursby16 (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable award. Can't find a single independent source about it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:N. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable. True award from the Club. [1] TheFootieGuy (talk) 21:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC) Striking !vote per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 13:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - TheFootieGuy was created on 29 October 2015 at 21:10... obviously a sock. JMHamo (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Account was blocked for violating WP:SOCK by an admin at 21:28, 29 October 2015, so this "keep" !vote should be discounted. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 21:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citing Man City for this award means that you have verified its existence, but you have not proved that it is a notable award. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable award, no independent sources. WP:GNG clearly failed. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 21:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 21:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 21:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable fancruft. Giant Snowman 09:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obvious cruft. A non-notable internal fan-based award that has garnered no significant reliable coverage outside of primary sources to even begin to satisfy GNG. The keep arguments above amount to nothing more than WP:ITEXISTS. Fenix down (talk) 10:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - even though it includes their best ever player. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better than Super Bob? Surely you jest ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha!! And just look at the Belgians!! EddieWaring123 (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Delete per WP:FANCRUFT as already noted. Jim Carter 07:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Thursby16 (talk). I think it is an important trophy to me, so it can given out by the club, but it is a Non-notable award, no independent sources. --Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because it is non-notable? That makes literally no sense at all..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.