The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - AfD was started by a sockpuppet of the kitten vandal and there are no serious arguments for deletion. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 22:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable, would Encyclopædia Britannica have an article about a social classification from 10 years ago? ChickenOut 21:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep Very notable, passes the Pokemon test with flying colours, remember [[Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_paper_encyclopedia|Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. ><Richard0612 ^UW 21:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Very notable and worthy of an article. See chav, WAGs, etc. Vickser 22:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep good factual article, quite useful. I believe it to be notable.--Andeh 22:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.