The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enfield TC-10

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One source that is unreliable. Non-notable firearm, fails WP:GNG. Reads like an advertisement, not manual of style conforming. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 01:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom.TH1980 (talk) 02:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete...FACEBOOK is not a RS. Clearly self promotion. --RAF910 (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot readily find any reliable secondary sources, plenty of mirroring it seems. Nothing to pass GNG that I can readily see. Aoziwe (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.