The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of tallest buildings in Edmonton#Projects. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Encore Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A residential / apartment building in Edmonton, CA. Like thousands of apartment buildings in the cities of the world, nothing notable about his Encore Tower which has not achieved any acclaim review or significant as it is still under construction . Fails WP:GEOFEAT CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. 22:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

• Redirect, presumably to List of tallest buildings in Edmonton#Projects or more specifically to this building's row in the table there. Redirect partly to keep the article history in place, because this is under construction and will have coverage about it. The List of tallest buildings in Edmonton has just two existing buildings with more floors. It seems highly likely this will be more clearly notable, soon. By the way, I hate and/or am bored by the numerous AFDs about tallest buildings, with the deletion nomination being ignorant about the obvious alternative-to-deletion of redirecting to the list-article. Obviously superior to outright deletion. So the AFD will not possibly succeed in deleting the article, and it doesn't count in running up your deletionist scoring, or it should not. Not sure how the deletionists score themselves, maybe causing an AFD discussion and using up other editors' time counts as a win no matter what. No offense intended to this deletion nominator specifically. :) --Doncram (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Does not appear to be notable. As it is mentioned in the Edmonton list article, redirecting there is acceptable. MB 04:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.