The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per G12 although it was also eligible under G4 and G11. I've also taken the liberty of WP:SALTing. Thryduulf (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elite Global

[edit]

Delete. Non-notable company, no reputable independent sources, fails WP:CORP. WWGB (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G11, blatent advertising, 100% copied from their website. --neon white talk 22:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since it's been speedy deleted twice (for the above reasons), deletion through AfD would be best--Work permit (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as a G12. Article is blatant copyright infringement of http://eliteglobal.do.am/ -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 18:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. G4, G11, G12, pick your poison. Fails WP:CORP for notability and any kind of verifiability, but that's frankly incidental.--Talain (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.