The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as it stands, but the Elementary Pragmatic Model (EPM) does look like a bona-fide subject - Google Scholar lists 25 articles that mention it: it seems to be central to this apparently independent paper, for instance, which states in its introduction that EPM was developed over 30 years ago. These [1], [2] also look good. So the subject may be notable and worthy of an article, but this obviously isn't it, being apparently a paper written by the inventor of the model. So can I actually !vote that someone who understands the concepts should completely rewrite the article? :) Smalljim23:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.