The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elemental warriors

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a self-published book series. It gets virtually no hits on Google, and there seem to be no professional reviews. Fails WP:BKCRIT and WP:GNG. Page was possibly created by the author of the book series. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While self-published works can occasionally get coverage enough to merit an article, this is not one of those instances. I wish the author well, but this just doesn't meet notability guidelines at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A self-published book series with no indication of notability and no forthcoming reliable sources. Moswento ^talky 09:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.