The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep it is early days yet and no attempt has been made to try and improve the article - a quick dig revealed a couple of interviews which could help provide more of an overview. I'm sure there is more out there to be had (reviews for example to help produce a "reception" section). (Emperor (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk)20:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.