The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. I could not find any significant reviews or other coverage; the article lists just one. I am also AfDing the author as non-notable. MelanieN (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NBOOKS. Jim Carter ^(talk) 20:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' per SPAM. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reviews to show this book reaches the claimed significance. I am not even sure the claims about eco-imperialism as a word created by this work are adequately are sourced.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Eco-imperialism#Driessen's text. There may be a bit of something here, after all. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 23:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep this is a unique and important book. Smokey TheCat 09:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.