The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eastwood Company

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company and Google News produced two relevant articles here and here, and two links here (press release) and here focusing with the company's products. SwisterTwister talk 04:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Company does not appear to meet WP:CORP. My search results were similar to nominator's: One article in Direct Marketing News and a few press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 21:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Waaay below what I would consider suitable for WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.