The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EarthCheck

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating this related page, which reads like an advertisement. If kept, should be merged.

And also nominating this page, which seems like a duplicate of the previous one:

There doesn't seem to be much out there about EarthCheck other than from their clients. Vectro (talk) 13:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that a total of three articles are nominated for deletion herein.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Because this is a certification for municipalities and other governmental units, the "clients" Vectro referred to above are doing things like putting it on road signs. See, for instance, this sign (in a stock photo found on Google, but I saw this sign last week). It's also been discussed in academic sustainability literature, for example here. Seems to me that it meets notability criteria, and moreover is the kind of thing people may wish usefully to look up in an encyclopedia. Krinsky (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC) [Update to clarify in light of re-listing: This is a "Keep" vote for EarthCheck. Merging the others seems sensible. Krinsky (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.