The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic Leap Technology Inc.

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Difficult to see where notability is supposed to be. Most of the refs are about individual apps and n ot the company. Those that are about the company are directory style listings, blogs or interviews with key players. Nothing here is a reliable and robust source for notability. Reads very much like an advertisement and its orphan status tends to corroborate that. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. I can't find any WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV - GretLomborg (talk) 21:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:PROMO. — fortunavelut luna 14:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.