The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 19:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dufferin Mall

[edit]

NN example of the many medium size, non distinctive malls in Toronto, lack of any special features in its stores and otherwise; no sources of any sort and no reason to think there will be. DGG 04:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep 567,000 sq feet isn't small by any means of the imagination. However, the article does need significant improvment to justify notability and history to make it acceptable to remain. Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep seems to have meaningful third-party coverage [1]. Some seem to be about the mall in a non-trivial way. I think we could write a decent article here. --W.marsh 18:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, in its present condition, the article is useless, but the information and notability is there. Cremepuff 222 (talk, review me!) 00:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having gross leasable area less than 800,000 square feet means it is not a superregional mall, so it is primarily of local significance. See also WP:MALL which has been tagged as rejected and historical, but which discusses the different recognized classes of malls. Edison 05:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has less leasable area because it is an urban mall. Though, I agree this article is weak. I think we can increase the value of the article if some attention is paid to it. This is a major mall (second largest in the old city of Toronto). This is definitely worth keeping.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.