The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect, they are cheap after all. Let me know if you think this is incorrect.. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Kenpo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Originally proposed as a merge with American Kenpo, but the editors there stated it is not noteworthy. (see Talk:American Kenpo#Merger_Proposal) Apparently there are many offshoots of American Kenpo, and the notable ones are already included in the American Kenpo page. Dragon Kenpo itself has no encyclopedic content. There is also another page on this topic, DragonKenpo, which, while longer, is even more spam-like, and is up for its own AfD. Livitup (talk) 16:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect but don't merge--redirects are cheap and it's a plausible search term. Otherwise, delete. JJL (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Dragon Kenpo is a non-notable marketing concept derived from American Kenpo. Vantelimus (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.