The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@SoWhy, SK#1 was modified to add "or redirection" some time in the last few years. Per that change, it's fine to bring a merge argument to AfD now because SK#1 does not apply. czar17:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@SoWhy, on paper, agreed, but SK hasn't been the impetus for such a venue change in a long time, in my experience. PM is preferred, but once someone takes it to AfD, SK is not the route out. czar20:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closer "Speedy keep" is not a valid rationale, since it only applies if no one else has voted to merge or delete. So far, two people including myself have, meaning that it was not a spurious/invalid nomination.ZXCVBNM (TALK)21:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, per WP:SK it applies unless someone argued for deletion or redirect. Merging is explicitly mentioned as an alternative that qualifies for speedy keep. So in fact there is only one !vote that spoils SK. However, the nomination was still incorrect because the nominator did not provide a reason for deletion but instead for merging and AFD is not the place for that. A later delete or redirect !vote does not mean the nominator did the right thing to bring it here. Regards SoWhy21:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This needs expansion and not merging. Passes WP:SIGCOV. See the following sources which have non-tangential coverage of the character, including several peer reviewed journal articles in highly respected medical journals:
Ellis, Nick (September 2008). What the Hell is That?': The Representation of Professional Service Markets in The Simpsons. Vol. 15. p. 705-723. ((cite book)): |work= ignored (help)
Coyne, John D (December 2012). Surgical Pathology and The Simpsons. Vol. 20(6). p. 599. ((cite book)): |work= ignored (help)
Kurtz, Michael P ; Nelson, Caleb P. Urology mythbusters: The 5:1 ratio in ureteral reimplantation. ((cite book)): |work= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.