The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy5 (talk) 00:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dora Pavel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I see no reson that this person is notable in the english speaking world. maybe on the romanian wikipedia. also, writer of article repeatedly removed templates from article. Sexy Sea Bassist 16:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- Bláthnaid 17:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The writer has received awards for her work and been written about, which makes her notable. Notability on en.wikipedia is not limited to the English-speaking world. It does not matter what language she writes in, as sources can be translated by editors that speak Romanian. Bláthnaid 17:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Independent coverage of subject who's won awards in her field. Sounds notable per WP:BIO to me. WilliamH (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - notable. non-english is not a reason to delete --T-rex 04:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Being notable in Romania (and France) also makes the person notable in the English-speaking world. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.